News is knowledge, Knowledge is news /
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy firmly resisted pressure from former U.S. President Donald Trump to accept a peace deal with Russia, even as Ukraine’s capital Kyiv was rocked by the most intense missile and drone attack of the year, underscoring the ongoing devastation of a war that has dragged on for more than two years. The deadly strike on April 24, 2025, sent shockwaves through the war-weary nation, leaving emergency crews scrambling to rescue survivors amid burning rubble and destroyed infrastructure. The assault, which came in the middle of the night, marked a dangerous escalation by Russian forces, who launched dozens of missiles and drones in a coordinated attempt to break Ukrainian resistance. Speaking from South Africa—where he was forced to abruptly cut short a diplomatic visit due to the attack—Zelenskiy made it clear that while Ukraine remains open to diplomatic solutions, any peace deal must be based on justice, sovereignty, and the complete restoration of Ukrainian territorial integrity. He emphasized that merely agreeing to talks with a country actively waging war on Ukraine was already a significant gesture of compromise. Trump, however, who remains a dominant voice in U.S. politics and has expressed strong opinions about the Ukraine conflict, is reportedly pressuring Kyiv to engage in rapid negotiations with Moscow, a move that has sparked concern among Ukrainian officials and some of the country’s allies. Trump’s stance appears focused on achieving what he calls "peace through strength," urging Kyiv to accept terms that could potentially end the fighting but might also freeze the conflict in place and legitimize Russia’s control over parts of Ukrainian land. Zelenskiy pushed back, declaring that any peace must not come at the expense of Ukraine’s sovereignty or its people’s freedom, and warning that giving in to Russian demands would embolden authoritarian regimes worldwide. He reminded the international community of the cost Ukraine has already borne: thousands of lives lost, millions displaced, and cities turned into battlegrounds, all because Russia invaded in violation of international law. The latest strike on Kyiv, which targeted residential areas, energy facilities, and government buildings, resulted in multiple civilian casualties and widespread damage. Footage from the ground showed emergency responders battling fires, pulling people from beneath collapsed buildings, and treating the injured in makeshift triage centers. The Ukrainian Air Force managed to intercept a number of incoming drones and missiles, but several still managed to reach their targets, underscoring the challenges Ukraine faces in defending its airspace. International reaction to the attack was swift, with European leaders condemning Russia’s aggression and reaffirming their support for Ukraine. The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting, though once again, efforts to pass a strong resolution were blocked by Russian vetoes. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg called the strike "a grim reminder" of why sustained support for Ukraine is essential, while U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken reiterated Washington’s backing for Ukraine’s right to self-defense. Despite this, Trump’s continued influence over segments of American politics has complicated the diplomatic landscape, with some members of Congress echoing his calls for a swift end to the conflict—even if it means pressuring Kyiv to make painful concessions. Zelenskiy, however, remains steadfast. In his televised address following the attack, he said, “Ukraine does not need peace at any price. We need peace that protects our people, our borders, and our future.” He also called for additional air defense systems, long-range missiles, and humanitarian aid, arguing that only a strong Ukraine can bring about a lasting and just peace. The timing of the Russian strike has fueled speculation that Moscow may be testing the West’s resolve and Zelenskiy’s leadership amid growing war fatigue in some Western capitals. Analysts say the Kremlin may be calculating that a high-profile attack could sow fear, lower morale, and push Ukraine’s allies toward pressuring Kyiv into negotiations. But far from breaking Ukraine’s spirit, the attack appeared to galvanize public unity, with citizens lining up to donate blood, volunteer for relief efforts, and reaffirm their support for the armed forces. In Kyiv, Mayor Vitali Klitschko described the night as one of the darkest since the full-scale invasion began but added, “We are still standing, and we will never kneel.” Meanwhile, Ukrainian intelligence has warned that Russia may be preparing for further attacks aimed at disrupting electricity supplies, transportation, and communications as part of a broader strategy to undermine Ukraine’s resilience before the winter. The psychological impact of such attacks is enormous, but Ukraine’s civil defense structures have adapted, with thousands of air raid shelters now active across the country and emergency services trained to respond quickly. Zelenskiy’s trip to South Africa had been part of a broader effort to rally Global South nations, many of whom have remained neutral or ambiguous in their stance on the war. He had planned to meet with several African leaders to explain Ukraine’s position and seek diplomatic and humanitarian support. His decision to return home immediately after the Kyiv bombing was seen as a powerful symbol of leadership, reinforcing his image as a wartime president who prioritizes the safety and morale of his people. In contrast, Trump’s messaging—delivered via Truth Social and other platforms—has stirred controversy. Critics argue that his approach undermines U.S. credibility and encourages aggressors like Vladimir Putin to persist with their military campaigns. Trump’s defenders, however, argue that his calls for peace are pragmatic and necessary to avoid a prolonged conflict. Still, most experts agree that any settlement that rewards Russia’s aggression could set a dangerous precedent globally. History has shown that appeasement rarely leads to lasting peace, and in this case, it could signal to other autocracies that military force is a viable means of achieving geopolitical aims. In the meantime, Ukrainian forces continue to hold the line along a complex and shifting front that stretches from the Kharkiv region in the northeast to the Black Sea coast. While the war has entered a phase of attritional fighting, with neither side gaining significant ground in recent months, both Ukraine and Russia continue to launch localized offensives, often at great human and material cost. Western military support remains critical, and Zelenskiy has repeatedly emphasized that Ukraine cannot win this war alone. Yet, it is clear that the resilience of the Ukrainian people—their refusal to bow under pressure, their determination to defend their homeland, and their belief in a democratic future—remains one of the most powerful forces driving the country forward. As Ukraine buries its dead and rebuilds from the ashes once again, the world watches to see whether courage, unity, and a commitment to freedom can overcome brute force and political pressure. The next phase of the war will likely be shaped not just by tanks and missiles, but by the choices made in diplomatic halls, on election trails, and in the hearts of people across the world who must decide what kind of future they want to defend.
//Zelenskiy Rejects Trump Pressure as Kyiv Faces Worst Russian Airstrike of 2025//
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy firmly resisted pressure from former U.S. President Donald Trump to accept a peace deal with Russia, even as Ukraine’s capital Kyiv was rocked by the most intense missile and drone attack of the year, underscoring the ongoing devastation of a war that has dragged on for more than two years. The deadly strike on April 24, 2025, sent shockwaves through the war-weary nation, leaving emergency crews scrambling to rescue survivors amid burning rubble and destroyed infrastructure. The assault, which came in the middle of the night, marked a dangerous escalation by Russian forces, who launched dozens of missiles and drones in a coordinated attempt to break Ukrainian resistance. Speaking from South Africa—where he was forced to abruptly cut short a diplomatic visit due to the attack—Zelenskiy made it clear that while Ukraine remains open to diplomatic solutions, any peace deal must be based on justice, sovereignty, and the complete restoration of Ukrainian territorial integrity. He emphasized that merely agreeing to talks with a country actively waging war on Ukraine was already a significant gesture of compromise. Trump, however, who remains a dominant voice in U.S. politics and has expressed strong opinions about the Ukraine conflict, is reportedly pressuring Kyiv to engage in rapid negotiations with Moscow, a move that has sparked concern among Ukrainian officials and some of the country’s allies. Trump’s stance appears focused on achieving what he calls "peace through strength," urging Kyiv to accept terms that could potentially end the fighting but might also freeze the conflict in place and legitimize Russia’s control over parts of Ukrainian land. Zelenskiy pushed back, declaring that any peace must not come at the expense of Ukraine’s sovereignty or its people’s freedom, and warning that giving in to Russian demands would embolden authoritarian regimes worldwide. He reminded the international community of the cost Ukraine has already borne: thousands of lives lost, millions displaced, and cities turned into battlegrounds, all because Russia invaded in violation of international law. The latest strike on Kyiv, which targeted residential areas, energy facilities, and government buildings, resulted in multiple civilian casualties and widespread damage. Footage from the ground showed emergency responders battling fires, pulling people from beneath collapsed buildings, and treating the injured in makeshift triage centers. The Ukrainian Air Force managed to intercept a number of incoming drones and missiles, but several still managed to reach their targets, underscoring the challenges Ukraine faces in defending its airspace. International reaction to the attack was swift, with European leaders condemning Russia’s aggression and reaffirming their support for Ukraine. The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting, though once again, efforts to pass a strong resolution were blocked by Russian vetoes. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg called the strike "a grim reminder" of why sustained support for Ukraine is essential, while U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken reiterated Washington’s backing for Ukraine’s right to self-defense. Despite this, Trump’s continued influence over segments of American politics has complicated the diplomatic landscape, with some members of Congress echoing his calls for a swift end to the conflict—even if it means pressuring Kyiv to make painful concessions. Zelenskiy, however, remains steadfast. In his televised address following the attack, he said, “Ukraine does not need peace at any price. We need peace that protects our people, our borders, and our future.” He also called for additional air defense systems, long-range missiles, and humanitarian aid, arguing that only a strong Ukraine can bring about a lasting and just peace. The timing of the Russian strike has fueled speculation that Moscow may be testing the West’s resolve and Zelenskiy’s leadership amid growing war fatigue in some Western capitals. Analysts say the Kremlin may be calculating that a high-profile attack could sow fear, lower morale, and push Ukraine’s allies toward pressuring Kyiv into negotiations. But far from breaking Ukraine’s spirit, the attack appeared to galvanize public unity, with citizens lining up to donate blood, volunteer for relief efforts, and reaffirm their support for the armed forces. In Kyiv, Mayor Vitali Klitschko described the night as one of the darkest since the full-scale invasion began but added, “We are still standing, and we will never kneel.” Meanwhile, Ukrainian intelligence has warned that Russia may be preparing for further attacks aimed at disrupting electricity supplies, transportation, and communications as part of a broader strategy to undermine Ukraine’s resilience before the winter. The psychological impact of such attacks is enormous, but Ukraine’s civil defense structures have adapted, with thousands of air raid shelters now active across the country and emergency services trained to respond quickly. Zelenskiy’s trip to South Africa had been part of a broader effort to rally Global South nations, many of whom have remained neutral or ambiguous in their stance on the war. He had planned to meet with several African leaders to explain Ukraine’s position and seek diplomatic and humanitarian support. His decision to return home immediately after the Kyiv bombing was seen as a powerful symbol of leadership, reinforcing his image as a wartime president who prioritizes the safety and morale of his people. In contrast, Trump’s messaging—delivered via Truth Social and other platforms—has stirred controversy. Critics argue that his approach undermines U.S. credibility and encourages aggressors like Vladimir Putin to persist with their military campaigns. Trump’s defenders, however, argue that his calls for peace are pragmatic and necessary to avoid a prolonged conflict. Still, most experts agree that any settlement that rewards Russia’s aggression could set a dangerous precedent globally. History has shown that appeasement rarely leads to lasting peace, and in this case, it could signal to other autocracies that military force is a viable means of achieving geopolitical aims. In the meantime, Ukrainian forces continue to hold the line along a complex and shifting front that stretches from the Kharkiv region in the northeast to the Black Sea coast. While the war has entered a phase of attritional fighting, with neither side gaining significant ground in recent months, both Ukraine and Russia continue to launch localized offensives, often at great human and material cost. Western military support remains critical, and Zelenskiy has repeatedly emphasized that Ukraine cannot win this war alone. Yet, it is clear that the resilience of the Ukrainian people—their refusal to bow under pressure, their determination to defend their homeland, and their belief in a democratic future—remains one of the most powerful forces driving the country forward. As Ukraine buries its dead and rebuilds from the ashes once again, the world watches to see whether courage, unity, and a commitment to freedom can overcome brute force and political pressure. The next phase of the war will likely be shaped not just by tanks and missiles, but by the choices made in diplomatic halls, on election trails, and in the hearts of people across the world who must decide what kind of future they want to defend.
Tags:
ONOFFTODAYNEWS