President Donald Trump’s recent executive order on U.S. elections has triggered widespread uncertainty among state and local election officials as they prepare for the 2026 midterms. The order introduces significant changes, including stricter voter registration requirements, decertification of certain voting systems, and tighter ballot deadlines. Many election officials are struggling to adapt, especially given the recent reduction in federal cybersecurity support.
One of the most controversial aspects of Trump’s order is the requirement for voters to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote. While supporters argue that this measure will help prevent illegal voting, critics warn that it could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters who lack easy access to birth certificates or passports. The order also tasks election officials with verifying citizenship, a process that experts say will be costly and complex without additional federal funding.
Election officials in states like Connecticut are particularly concerned about the implications for voting equipment. Connecticut’s Secretary of the State, Stephanie Thomas, expressed worries over whether the state’s newly purchased $20 million ballot scanners will comply with the order’s requirements. She also pointed out that most states do not have the financial resources to frequently upgrade their election systems. “Imagine people purchased new equipment and now it no longer can be used. There is no remedy for that in the order,” Thomas said.
Trump’s order has also heightened tensions between state governments and federal authorities. The executive order criticizes how U.S. elections are conducted and praises other countries’ election systems. Trump has long questioned the integrity of American elections, falsely claiming that noncitizen voting cost him additional support in California in 2016 and that his 2020 loss was due to fraud—claims that have been repeatedly debunked.
The executive order has led to concerns about increased voter confusion. Election officials warn that if they themselves are uncertain about new regulations, voters will be even more confused, potentially reducing trust in the system. Kate Sweeney Bell, an election official in Indiana, fears that these rapid changes could make it harder for election workers to educate the public. “I feel for every other state that doesn’t have the prohibitive laws that Indiana does, because it’s a rough couple of election cycles when changes like this are made,” she said.
Another major issue is the impact on voting machines. Trump’s order calls for the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to update standards, effectively decertifying certain voting systems that use barcodes or QR codes. This could force many states to replace their voting machines, but the order provides no funding for such upgrades. Experts warn that replacing voting systems is a lengthy and expensive process, requiring procurement approvals, manufacturing time, and staff training. Mark Lindeman, a policy expert at Verified Voting, noted, “It’s hard for any state to procure and obtain and test new voting systems, and if there was some mad rush for many states to replace their voting systems at once, we don’t know how many systems manufacturers could supply.”
Legal challenges are expected to delay implementation, leaving election officials uncertain about how to proceed. Joseph Kirk, who oversees elections in Bartow County, Georgia, emphasized the urgency of resolving these issues. “I really hope we have some clarity on some of this stuff soon because no matter what the answers are, I need to take care of my voters,” he said.
As the 2026 midterms approach, election officials, voters, and legal experts alike will be closely watching the battle over Trump’s election order. With concerns about voter access, election security, and federal overreach dominating discussions, the coming months are likely to be critical in shaping the future of U.S. elections.